Calendar Saturday, July 31, 2010
Text Size
   
Is This a New York State of Mind? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Len Sherman   
Thursday, 15 May 2008
Not content to botch immigration policy all by itself, Congress has handed large parts of the job to others to mishandle. It gave the homeland security czar the czarist powers to overturn any law and ignore any court to seal the border. Now Michael Chertoff is clear-cutting a forest of regulations to wall out Mexico by the end of the year. And through the program known as 287(g), his agency is parceling out duties to a growing number of local police and sheriff’s departments, raising an army of junior deputies in the war on illegal immigrants.

To see how unhinged things have become, it pays to zero in on the squalid doings in Maricopa County, Ariz. It is home to Phoenix, the country’s fifth-largest city, and the largest 287(g) program anywhere.

It is run by the county sheriff, Joe Arpaio, who has built a national reputation for toughness through years of cruelty to prison inmates and an insatiable appetite for publicity. Where most departments have only handfuls of officers trained to enforce federal immigration laws, Sheriff Joe, as he is known, has 160. Their efforts are supplemented by what the sheriff says, without apology, is a 3,000-member “posse.”
NY Times
I lived in or around New York City for close to the first 40 years of my life. So I get the whole New-York-is-the-center-of-the-world zeitgeist.

I not only get it, I agree. I agree that New York today is the Rome of 2,000 years ago, the global intersection of politics, commerce and culture. I get the arrogance of New Yorkers, the us-against-southern senators/rats/French tourists/slush/Red Sox/and virtually everyone and everything else.

I get it.

What I don't get is the arrogance of the New York Times,not in taking on Arizona and immigration, but taking on Arizona andimmigration in such a shoddy, cavalier manner - and not only once, but again and again.

Item: In discussing the sheriff's enthusiastic employment ofSection 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, providing thelegal authority for state and local law enforcement agencies to investigate, detain and arrest illegal aliens on civil and criminal grounds, the editorial states that his 160 federally-trained deputies are augmented by "what the sheriff says, without apology, is a 3,000 member 'posse.' "

The paper quotes the sheriff detailing that 500 posse members are armed, and come equipped with their own airplanes, jeeps, motorcycles,etc., while stating that "state and county officials" claimed that thesheriff had "grossly violated" the terms of 287(g). The implication is that this is somehow a problem - no, a danger - all those gun-crazy cowboys running around, violating civil rights, shooting up the town.

Fact: In the long history of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Posse, no posse member has ever shot anyone.

Fact: All that scary stuff - "airplanes, jeeps, motorcycles,"etc., not to mention horses, bicycles, and yes, even boats - are more often used in search-and-rescue operations than in invading suburban neighborhoods. But why would the Times bother to know that?

And why would the Timesfail to understand that citizens volunteering to help protect their communities does not pose a quasi-fascist threat, nor require an"apology," but rather stands as a proud American tradition and anessential democratic impulse?

The editorial states that Sheriff Joe has "ignored tens of thousands of outstanding criminal warrants while chasing" illegals. Sounds bad,doesn't it?

Fact: Of the 70,000 warrants outstanding in Maricopa County, (an area the size of New Jersey, incidentally), 30,000 are for misdemeanors. The remaining 40,000 are divided amongst the 19 police agencies in the county, out of which the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office issued approximately 1,500.

What is most condescending and plain insulting about the Times' analysis is its position that elected officials in Arizona are not qualified totake action to protect the state and its citizens. The Timeswants Congress to hold hearings on the 287(g) agreement between thelocals and the feds, "starting with a subpoena for Sheriff Joe."

Clearly, according to the Times,we out West don't know what we are doing, and can't be trusted with ourown land or fate. We need the feds to tell us what's best for us. Astonishing. Can you imagine the Times insisting that the NewYork Police Department is not qualified to protect the five boroughs, and should hand over its responsibilities and power to the FBI?

Of course not. But now you're talking about New York, not Arizona, or some other flyover state.

One last personal note: Even though I am the co-author of Sheriff Joe's forthcoming book, I don't agree with his stand on immigration. I'd letmost everyone who wants to come to this country and work and speak English and become a citizen stay and grow and prosper. That, to me, is the American way.

Nonetheless, the Times' patronizingattitude towards my fellow Arizonans is just too much, as is its dismissive stance towards Joe Arpaio, a smart, courageous and decent man, who has spent almost 50 years federal and local law enforcement.

We all appreciate the classic New Yorker cartoon, with the map showing New York dwarfing the rest of the country. But let's not forget: It's a cartoon.
Last Updated ( Thursday, 22 May 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >